Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Suffice it to say collectors acquire information from a wide variety of sources. In all honesty, I don't read every blog, and spend little time (if any) on message boards. In truth, I thought I was doing the right thing in crediting Chris because when I went to find the link on his blog I didn't even read the post. Why? Because originally all he did was post a link to the eBay auction with the rhetorical question, "What's wrong with this picture?" via Twitter.
So again Beardy, I apologize.
So, in the future, when I opine on a subject, it will be to simply give my two cents and in no way will be presented as a breaking story and/or I will no longer credit where I heard about it from originally so as not to confuse anyone of the story's actual source of origin. Fair enough?
Anyway, I digress. By now we have all heard the issue with what appears to be a Sam Bradford Mirror Black Parallel RC Auto 1/1 being used as a redemption substitute. The big concern in the mind of collectors being obviously, why wasn't one of the product's best cards packed out?
Fair enough question. But, do we have all the facts and are the right questions being asked.
If I am not mistaken, all we have to date is the back of the card. How de we know this wasn't one of the cards created for the Toronto Expo that went unclaimed? I am not saying it is but before jumping to conclusions I waited 24 hours to write this post and instead contacted Tracy Hackler at Panini directly (via Twitter, to which he replied) and stated that he was, currently, "Looking into it now (the situation.)" I followed up later that night (again via Twitter) and instantly got a response saying, " . . . waiting on feedback from a couple of people."
At this time there still hasn't been an official response from Panini (or Topps either) on these two issues. I understand that mistakes happen but what I don't appreciate is for a company(s) that wants to engage collectors through the use of social media, to throw us bouquets with free contests and disseminate information and such, on one hand, and then toplay clueless and bury their head in the sand when it comes to issues like these on the other. You can't have it both ways.
With the Sam Bradford issue specifically, we are still waiting on several factors and don't have all the information necessary to render an opinion yet, and in truth we may never, we can only speculate. HOWEVER, if it is true that this card is in fact, definitively, THE Panini Certified Mirror Black 1/1 Parallel and it never made it into packs, that is an issue than needs to be addressed and procedures changed to insure that it never, ever happens again.
Redemption cards, as we know are a legalized form of bait and switch that we have all come to live with or at least tolerate. THIS, however, THIS, would be a whole other issue completely.
Let's see what Panini has to say?
Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Monday, January 24, 2011
Personally, I used to have the time to go through my Google Reader/Blog Roll everyday but those days are long gone. From a time management standpoint I find the blogs I still read are the ones I am aware of that have posted something new. How do I become aware something new has been posted? You guessed it, my Twitter time line, which I check numerous times per day. The more pertinent question is as a blogger, why wouldn't you? You increase your audience, reach and site statistics. You can engage and aggregate an audience you might not have reached other wise and most importantly, you stay relevant.
I honestly don't mean this to be a slap in the face or condescending to any of my fellow bloggers not utilizing this but instead to implore and encourage you to do so. It's extremely easy. I use Twitterfeed it takes literally seconds to set up, is totally turnkey and you never bother with it again.
As a blogger, what you have to say matters. It matters to me and it matters to your other readers. You've chosen to use your voice for a reason. Why institute a self-imposed gag order on yourself by not broadcasting your message in real time, to a wider audience?
Regardless of the reasoning, as explained quite logically by Steven Judd at Sports Card File, Topps needs to admit the mistake and rectify the situation. Plain and simple. When you have gone to great lengths to capitalize on being the defacto baseball card company in the market, you have a certain responsibility to consumers and collectors. You need to operate with integrity and not ignorance, ethics and not arrogance.
In my mind, these are the steps Topps needs to take in addressing the issue, but I would be willing to bet none of them will happen.
1) Conduct an internal audit and investigation to determine how this specifically happened.
2) Take measure, as appropriate, to insure it NEVER happens again.
3) Issue a Press Release admitting to the mistake, explaining how it happened and what changes have been made to insure another incident like this isn't repeated.
4) Offer the current owner of the card 2x the purchase price to have the card removed from the marketplace.
5) Provide the current owner a replacement.
As dayf from Carboard Junkie has pointed out, yes, it could be worse, as we all remember this fiasco from last year, but this is pretty bad too.
Hanie proceeded to put together 2 touchdown drives and pull the Bears with in 7 points. With enough time to develop a sustained, clock consuming drive, Hanie eventually succumbed to the pressure throwing a game ending pick.
To his credit, instead of looking like a fish out of water, he looked every bit as capable if not more so than the players ahead of him on the position depth chart.
His cardboard had some instant interest as can be seen here in completed auctions yesterday.
Friday, January 21, 2011
The black and white cards measure 2" x 3" and designate the indicted players with a black border. The most famous player on that team, Shoeless Joe Jackson, has a duplicate card as you can see that has been colorized. Despite coming from an era of over production and regularly searching for Shoeless Joe items on the secondary market, this is the first time I have seen.
The cards are un-numbered and are blank backed with the exception of the Shoeless Joe Jackson cards which includes a short biopic.
Monday, January 17, 2011
Read the rest.
Saturday, January 15, 2011
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Declining print ad revenues across all forms of media, both B2B and B2C are
something that traditional publishing companies have been struggling with since the invention of the Internet by Al Gore in the early 90's. (I'm STILL convinced that is why he lost the election, what an idiot but I digress). Regardless of if you are a major publishing icon like Rupert Murdoch or a niche publisher like F+W, the inability of publishing companies to effectively monetize an online strategy has effectively served as the demise for numerous publishers.
The ability, or in some cases, inability, to grasp the importance of social media has further plagued traditional media companies and publishers who have long relied on an antiquated business model of disseminating information and waiting for readers, users and consumers to come to them. The world doesn't work that way anymore. if you aren't bringing me the information I want, chances are I have little time or interest in seeking it out.
A great example of this in the blogsphere is my friend, Adam Gellman, at Sports Cards Uncensored. I have asked him repeatedly to set up a Twitterfeed for his blog. Why? Because most of the time, it's the only way I will know a blog I value, follow, or have interest in has published new content. He still hasn't done so and to this day I can say I read his post less than I used to because he is not pushing that information to me.
Now look at Krause/F+W Media who of all Hobby related entities needed to get ahead of the curve when it came to social media and instead languished in an archaic information dissemination model. They proved how incapable they were of adapting to new media just last year when, having been pressed on a particular issue, columnist forced blogger, T.S O'Connell turned off comments on his blog. In my humble opinion, no act more symbolized the disconnect and lack of understanding about the developing age of media than that act and the fiasco that resulted.
Now, looking at my friend and yours, Beckett Media LLC, we see a much different story. Have they capitalized on the mistakes of Tuff Stuff and avoided the same pitfalls? Yes. To a degree. Now in all honesty, the following will obviously be subject to conjecture but I will try to approach this with some calculated reasoning. The removal of Tuff Stuff's Sports Card Monthly from the equation, leaves potential advertisers only one place to spend their print ad budget and that is with Beckett, obviously. However, in my opinion, there is little doubt that even with this event having transpired in the market place, that Beckett's publications could NOT survive as a stand alone business property. The decrease in ad revenue across ALL print media simply can't be replaced regardless of the number of print or OPG subscribers they add. No, the publications will continue and might even at some point return to profitablity as the result of them being only one cog in a machine.
The Beckett brand name will forever be tied to their publications. That brand awareness and recognition serves as a "traffic driver" of sorts for their other properties; Beckett Select Auctions, Beckett Grading Services, and The Beckett Marketplace. Diversity has been the key to Beckett being able to weather the media storm and to their credit they have been much better at developing online revenue streams and embracing, instead of resisting, social media.
While I am obviously not privy to their balance sheet, ad rates are public. Keep in mind also that most advertising sales reps. never, ever, ever, ever sell at rate card but instead discount those rates as an incentive to buy. So if you take their listed rate card pricing and count the number of ads you see in an issue and multiply out the math from subscription $'s and their circulation numbers, you can see that when you account for employee salaries and benefit costs, variable and non variable expenses, etc. it would be very hard to see profiting solely from their publications.
Media is changing, and the demise of Tuff Stuff is sad for the simple fact that, right or wrong, in the mind of many collectors, old and new, Beckett will continue and now even more so, serve as the sole voice of an industry.
Tuesday, January 11, 2011
Sunday, January 9, 2011
I don’t get it, plain and simple. My parents always taught me that if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything at all. Unfortunately, when it comes to product reviews and editorial, we don’t have that luxury and instead have a responsibility, to you, the collector, to provide unbiased opinion and commentary on the products we receive.
So instead, I’ll try to keep this brief. In a nutshell, 2010 Topps Prime Football is an uninspired hodgepodge of other brands that has been forcibly morphed into a gruesome and sinister hybrid. In addition to the unnecessary monstrosity that is Prime Football, it is packaged in the most un-eco-friendly McDonald’s apple pie type boxes, per pack. All this serves to reinforce the fact that Topps Prime Football is nothing more than a bunch of fluff with no redeeming substance.
Read the rest and see what got pulled here.
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
287 Wins - 3,701 Strikeouts - 3.31 ERA
Almost a 3:1 Strikeout to Walk Ratio
4,970 Innings Pitched
Tuesday, January 4, 2011
It's the execution of the product that usually leaves me disappointed.
Take for instance, this card:
As a Cal Ripken Jr. collector, I think I am actually offended by what an eyesore this card is to look at.
When it comes to the Hollywood Materials set, they have included some beautiful cards. This is one of them:
This card, isn't:
I don't care that the orientation of the Bing Crosby stamp is horizontal. If you are going to place it in a vertical cut out, you have to position the stamp the same way even if it means cropping the white strip you see on the top and bottom of the stamp as it sits now. Here is a link to the complete listings.
Monday, January 3, 2011
Sunday, January 2, 2011
To be eligible, products must have been released between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2010
Most Over-Hyped/Rated Sports Collectibles Story
Manufacturer of the Year
(Consistency in- Product schedule, execution, on time delivery, value, and design)
Best Overall Sports Card Product
(Price point, design, value)
Tristar TNA Icons or Xtreme
Worst Overall Sports Card Product
(Same criteria as above)
Any Bowman product
Best Low End Product
(Under $50 per box)
Upper Deck Baseball
Runner-up: Score Football
Honorable Mention: Topps Update
Best Mid-Range Product
Tristar TNA Icons or Xtreme
Runner-up: Upper Deck Series 1
Honorable Mention: Tristar Obak Baseball- History of the Game
Best High End Product
Press Pass Showcase
Runner-up: Topps Five Star Football (Pre-mature)
Best thing(s) to happen to The Hobby?
1. A second license added for NHL products
2. Two successful books that gave The Hobby positive mainstream press- Mint Condition and Cardboard Gods
3. Manufacturers embracing social media
Worst thing to happen to The Hobby?
1. Licensing contraction
2. Over saturation of the football card market leading to depreciated secondary market values
Bowman Draft Picks and Prospects
Really? Remember when Bowman was "Home of the Rookie Card"? Now what is it? The home of the prospect and gimmicks? The home of "We Can't Come Up With an Original Brand and Name"?
I have long despised Topps thumbing their nose at the 'rookie card rule'. While I don't necessiarily like having a designated RC logo on the cards themselves, I understand the spirit for which the rule was created. Quite simply being to alleviate confusion in the marketplace and allow for novice collectors and casual fans to easily identify which card is a player's "TRUE" rookie card. Bowman DPP doesn't as a brand doesn't aid that goal and only makes it more confusing.
Platinum and Sterling, while cute with the whole family of metallic compound thing, are really unneccesary products. Bowman has become so redundant as a brand it borders on the ridiculous. It's bad enough that, with the exception of Platinum and Sterling, you can hardly tell one year from another. The worth of the whole brand has been reduced to a refractor chase rendering even the base RC cards within the Bowman family line of products virtually worthless.As for BDPP again, if I wanted players in their minor league uniforms, I'd buy those products.
And whatever happened to Bowman's Best? With an auto per pack and only $10, that was a way better product configuration than Sterling.
What do you think should be done with the Bowman brand of products?